Set in a world where twins are psychically connected, The Forest is a horror movie about a woman trying to find her sister in Aokigahara forest.
Imagine, if you will, a combination between a haunting and a sexually transmitted disease. That’s pretty much the plot of It Follows right there.
The world can be a stressful place sometimes and when you finally get a break from that what could be better than going on a killing spree, I am of course talking about games not real life murder which, for the record, I don’t condone. Anyway, recently I found myself under a lot of stress and couldn’t get my fix of video game violence because of a new hard drive.
Unwilling to replay any of my old games I decided that, when the stress eased up a bit, I’d buy a new game. Nothing fancy just something old and cheap. One game stuck out in my memory and I decided to hunt it down. It’s called F.E.A.R. (First Encounter Assault Recon) and it was first recommended to me last year by a guy that worked in a GameStop that has now shut down. After a bit of searching I found the game pre-owned, ironically in a GameStop, and bought it.
F.E.A.R. is a psychological horror first person shooter that was released on PC, Xbox 360 and PS3 between 2005 and 2007. The game follows the F.E.A.R. team as they investigate a supernatural phenomenon and naturally you play as the point man, which is a soldier that is sent in first all the time as sort of a lookout. This means that you’re fighting thousands of soldiers all by yourself and to make matters worse, and a lot more fun, the supernatural phenomenon occasionally pops up to scare the hell out of you.
As a massive horror fan I think that GameStop guy was right, this game is great. It’s been a long time since I’ve ever been really scared, but this might change that. To add to the atmosphere I’ve been playing the game alone in the dark, I know my commitment is incredible and a little excessive. Naturally, after one day it’s hard to say whether F.E.A.R. is truly worth the GameStop recommendation, but for now I’m really enjoying it and props to pre-owned games. I was considering not getting it because of a bad experience I had years ago, but this seems to run without any trouble and has barely any scratches. So there you go adopt a game, you won’t regret it.
What do you think? Have you played F.E.A.R.? Do you buy pre-owned games? Are you a fan of the horror genre? Let me know by voting and leaving a comment below. Also, don’t forget to follow and click the like button if you liked this post.
For those of you that thought showering was just a time to wind down and get clean, you are about to get a rude awakening as Psycho returns for yet another instalment, but this time it’s television.
Even if you’ve never seen the 1960 film Psycho, its sequels, the prequel, its last attempt at a TV spinoff or the 1998 remake, you probably know about the infamous shower scene and that’s because the film, especially that scene, is a horror classic. Show me one other film that had to be shot in black and white to avoid being ‘too gory’, a concept which is lost these days.
The original film is about, momma’s boy, Norman Bates who runs a motel with his mother. Then an unsuspecting shower user comes to stay and the rest is Hollywood history. Two sequels followed, completely unrelated to the two sequels of the book the original film was based on, then came a prequel, that looked at Bates’ teenage years, followed by a spinoff were the motel is reopened and murders start again and finally, in 1998, a nearly shot for shot remake of the original film was made. The new TV series will be called Bates Motel, the same name used for the spinoff, and will once again examine the teenage years of Norman Bates.
Though still in the early stages of development the show is said to give a close look at how Norman became a psycho. The story will show him from childhood and through his teenage years, providing the pilot gets picked up. Viewers will get to see how his mother, Norma, and her lover damaged Norman, putting him on the path to become a killer. Last time a Psycho show was proposed, the pilot wasn’t picked up and it was instead turned into a TV movie spinoff. Hopefully this version doesn’t suffer the same fate as it will be interesting to see were, in 2012, they will take the story. It’s no secret that movies are scarier these days than they were in the past, how will this change the story?
What do you think? Would you like to see this show get made? Are you a fan of the original movie? Have you ever read the book? Let me know by voting a leaving a comment below, also don’t forget to follow/subscribe and, if you enjoyed this post, click the like button.
Paramount has confirmed that a fourth film, in the Paranormal Activity series, is in production.
This news comes as a surprise to just about no one, these movies are so cheap to make and rake in millions. It’s not hard to see why they’d want the franchise to continue, but how long can they keep going before they’re just forcing something, that should have ended a long time ago, into our faces? Final Destination comes to mind, though I am a sucker for those films, and I’m not saying Paranormal Activity has reached that point yet, just wondering if they’ll stop before it does.
The first Paranormal Activity introduced the viewers to this couple, Katie and Micah, and we learn, along with the Micah, that Katie is haunted by a demon. As the two, especially Micah, play around with the spirit the haunting gets worse. We are then, in the second one, shown Katie’s sister, Kristi, and her family being haunted, which provides some answers about the demon. The third instalment explores Katie and Kristi’s childhood, thus further going into the origin of the haunting, but leaving many unanswered questions about the characters in the present day. This is potentially what the fourth film will focus on and if so this could, and probably should, be the end of the series.
Paranormal Activity is, in my eyes, a great franchise. It takes everything good about old ghost stories and just looks at it in a different way. There’s nothing really overly complicated, though the plot does get deeper as the films go on, and there’s something very scary about keeping things simple. It’s like how bad practical effects are classic, but bad CGI is laughable. My only hope is that they don’t mess it up. Keep going for the story and the characters, not for the money and the fans.
What do you think? Are you excited about Paranormal Activity 4? Have you seen the other 3? Do you think they’re scary? Let me know by voting and leaving a comment below. Also don’t forget to subscribe/follow and click the like button. P.S. I have a Twitter account, just saying nonchalantly.
Good and bad news about the next Resident Evil film, Resident Evil: Retribution. Millia Jovovich, aka Alice, announced on twitter that the next film will feature Leon S. Kennedy, Ada Wong and Barry Burton. The bad news is that she also said that Chris and Claire Redfield and K-Mart will not be in the movie. Their absence will be explained as them being captured by Umbrella, this makes two times that’s happened to K-Mart and one and a half for Claire, who narrowly escaped the first time but not before being placed under Umbrella control.
The plot will follow Alice, along with Leon, Ada and Barry, as they try to find Claire and the others. Though I’m guessing that since the actors aren’t going to appear in the film, they aren’t successfully located thus leaving it open for yet another sequel, which doesn’t bother me in the slightly. Also set to appear in the film is Boris Kodjoe, who will be reprising his role as Luther West (possible love interest for Alice).
So far no actors have been announced to play Leon, Ada or Barry. However, Jovovich did say that Jensen Ackles, who was previously approached about the role, is filming Supernatural and will not be playing Leon. Sienna Guillory will return to play Jill, this time for more than ten seconds. In fact, Jovovich said that Alice and Jill will have a huge fight scene, which should be fun. Shaun Roberts will also make a reappearance as Albert Wesker, hopefully this time he won’t die a million times. We’ll have to wait a year to find out though as the film isn’t scheduled for release until the 14th of September 2012, but I’m sure we’ll have some casting news soon as shooting begins in October.
What do you think about this news? Who would you cast as Ada, Leon or Barry? Do you secretly long to be in a post-apocalyptic zombie infested world? If not, why not? Let me know by voting and leaving a comment below. Also don’t forget to subscribe and click the like button.
Prefer you’re vampires sparkling in the sun? Well then look away now, as the Fright Night remake returns vampires to there heartless bloodthirsty selves.
Fright Night 3D is a remake of the original Fright Night, which came out in 1985. Fright Night has a huge fan base, so it’s not hard to see why they decided to remake it. It’s a dangerous move messing with a story that so many people care about, but luckily they pulled it off.
The plot differs from the original, it isn’t entirely different but there are a lot changes. In this version Charley has gained popularity and now ignores his old geeky friends, even when one of them, Ed Thompson who is played by Christopher Mintz-Plasse, warns him that his neighbour, Jerry, is a vampire. Having not seen the original it’s hard to give a good comparison, but in that version Charley is still friends with Ed and is as unpopular as ever. To my understanding, there are a lot of differences especially in the middle part of the film. This could put fans of the original off, but judging the movie on its own merits it’s a pretty amazing film.
The graphics are great and that includes the 3D. I’m not a fan of 3D, I think it adds nothing to the film and isn’t worth the price. Fright Night is the exception. The 3D was not simply used to add depth, which is a waste of time and money, things were coming out at you. It made people flinch and reached out to try touch things (yeah that actually happened I seen it), it got the audience involved. The vampire effects were great and sometimes even resembled the effects used on the original. It was really nice to see a vampire be a vampire and not some love sick, sparkly little girl.
Colin Farrell and Anton Yelchin both did a great job. The teenagers didn’t look like teenagers though, especially Yelchin who is actually only 22 he just always looks older to me. Farrell’s accent was flawless and he really was perfect for the role. Again, I didn’t see the original so I am judging by his performance in this movie rather than how he compared to Chris Sarandon, who played the character in the first Fright Night. There wasn’t one cast member that I didn’t like, they all did really well. One thing I will say is that his mother can really faint, she was out for way too long (you’ll see what I mean when you see it).
Fright Night 3D was one of the most fun films I’ve seen in a long time. I genuinely enjoyed myself from start to finish; it was the gem of Film Fest. I recommend seeing it whether or not you are a fan of the original. Give it a chance; don’t hate it simply because you like the first one. Seeing it has got me really excited about the first one and I will be getting in on DVD, as will a lot of people I expect.
What do you think? Have you seen the original? Did you enjoy this film? Let me know by voting and leaving a comment below.
Okay so I know it’s not a new movie, but it’s not really well known, at least not outside of America. It came out last year, 2010, and it was written and directed by Wes Craven so you know it’s got to be (pause for effect) interesting.
Last night I watched My Soul to Take and I have to say I was expecting worse. I hadn’t read any details about the film, but I had seen a clip that just looked, unintentionally, hilarious. Also I’d read that it got really bad reviews from critics, I haven’t read what they said I just know that they hated the movie.
The movie really throws you in the deep end, it doesn’t spend a lot of time explaining what’s going on or who these characters are, which forces you to think about it and really try piece the details together yourself. Personally, I like this, because I think it makes you engage with the film and you sort of get into the whole experience more, but I can see that, from a different point of view, it could be seen as really annoying and unnecessary.
Though, I must say that putting together all the pieces would have been a lot easier if they were all included in the box. There are parts of the plot that are left completely unexplained, which is down to bad editing. Guess where I found the answers that were not in the movie (pause, this time to leave time to guess) the deleted scenes of course. The movie has a running time of 1 hour and 42 minutes (including credits). I get that leaving in every deleted scene would be impossible, there is quite a few of them, but would it have killed them to cut out some of the stuff that doesn’t make any sense, the aforementioned unintentionally hilarious scene for example, and put in the scenes that explain the plot? I think not.
The movie opens by showing how the Riverton Ripper was caught and allegedly died. Then it cuts to sixteen years later were, on the anniversary of this supposed death, the teenagers of the town, hold a party were one of the seven children that were born on the night the killer died must pretend to fight off a puppet of the killer (now this isn’t the kind of puppet you’ll be seeing on Sesame Street, I warn you). Of course the mentally challenged kid gets pick and freaks out, but the party is broken up by the police. Then the killer begins to kill again. Is it the original killer or is it one of the seven who is carrying the soul of the killer inside them.
One of the things I really liked about the film is that it relies heavily on mental illness, but also teams it with the supernatural. The story follows Adam ‘Bug’ Hellerman, a sixteen year old that suffers from mental illness. Of course if you don’t watch the deleted scenes you might just think Bug is really weird. Since you see everything as he sees it it’s not really clear whether anything supernatural is happening or if it could all be due to mental illness. I would recommend the film, but not to everyone. It’s kind of a movie for people that like to think and analyze movies. If you’re the type of person who goes home and googles the movie you just saw, and you like horror movies, then I think you’ll really like this movie, but if for you the movie ends when the credits roll maybe you should give this one a miss.
What do you think? Have you seen it? Did you love it or hate it? Let me know by voting and leaving a comment below. Also don’t forget to subscribe.
A trailer for the upcoming movie Final Destination 5 has been released and it looks as though producers have taking fan criticism onboard.
Many people have been complaining that the Final Destination series has gotten stale, seriously how many times can you make the same movie. The first too were great, because they had a link to each other, the third one introduced the photos which was a fun way to get the audience guessing, but the fourth just ditched the cleverness and went for 3D instead. The result was an overly bright example of how bad some actors are.
The trailer for Final Destination 5 shows that the franchise is going back to its roots. It’s darker and the deaths are less comical and more cringe worthy. The opening deaths are always one of my favourite parts. However, the writers try to make each opening better than the last and number three’s rollercoaster was hard to beat, four failed, but I think five might have succeeded.
Number five’s premonition takes place on a wire bridge. It doesn’t sound like much, but it looks great. There’s so much going on and so many characters to choose from, I’m already wondering who survives. Those that do survive will have a good chance of clinging on to their survivor status, because this movie will see the return of Bludworth (played by actor Tony Todd) who was last seen in Final Destination 2 and last heard in Final Destination 3. I was worried that he would appear for a few seconds, but from the trailer I can see he gives a whole speech to the survivors. I’m excited to see how they find him considering that all the survivors from the movies that featured him are dead.
Another good point about the trailer is that, and I could be wrong here, but it looks like the actors can act. I know I’m as shocked as you are. I never had a problem with the actors in the original trilogy, I hate to keep picking on it, but it was only four that I thought had really bad actors. Other people think the bad acting goes back furthered, but I think we can all hope that it ended with number four. We won’t really know until we see more though, but enjoy the trailer and let me know what you think by voting and leaving a comment below. Also don’t forget to subscribe.
After a 12 year break, Phantom Menace star, Darth Maul makes an appearance in James Wan’s Insidious.
Okay so it may not be Darth Maul, but it’s pretty damn close. Anyway, Insidious was made by, both, the creators of Saw and the creators of Paranormal Activity, which are two very different types of horror films. Saw is all about the visuals, the traps, gore, etc, but Paranormal Activity focuses more on suspense, as a result, Insidious, falls somewhere in the middle.
The story follows a couple, Renai and Josh, and their three children as they move into a new house. One of their sons, Dalton, is scared of his new room. One night he hears a noise in the attic, which he explores, but a step on the ladder breaks causing him to fall. He seems fine, besides being terrified by something in the corner of the room, but the next day they find he has slipped into a coma. The strangeness in the house increases so much that the family, who are taking care of Dalton at home, decide to move. However, the move proves fruitless and they are forced to face the truth; it’s not the house that’s haunted it is their son.
The film has received fairly positive reviews, but a common complaint, among fans and critics, is that the end of the movie cannot possibly live up to the high standard that is set by the rest of the film. The plot sounds like a rollercoaster ride and, if the reviews are true, you’ll be watching it with your eyes closed. If you live in America, you may already have seen it, but for us Irish folk, and people in the UK, we’ll have to wait until the 29th of April, which is only two days away, but still.
Patrick Wilson and Rose Byrne star as Josh and Renai, respectively, and it was directed by James Wan. If you’re a horror movie fan then this is probably a must see, it’s already the most profitable film of 2011 and it’s not even out everywhere yet. Let me know what you think by voting and leaving a comment below. Also don’t forget to subscribe.